Gun Control, Outraged Yet?

I’m a proud gun owner and member of the NRA.  I firmly believe in the 2nd Amendment and it’s intent to allow citizens to arm themselves against those that would do them harm including a tyrannical government.  A man (or woman) cannot truly be free if he cannot defend his own life, those of his loved ones or protect his property.  People cannot truly enjoy life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness if their government does not fear them or forgets from where that government derives its power.

So it is with great interest that I watch Congress and several states try to make us all safer by banning high capacity magazines, banning certain weapons and further clamping down on the free exchange of legal goods.  I’m not going to focus on the specific stupidity of these measures.  They are apparent to anyone with the ability to employ reason and logic.  As if fifteen rounds will save lives as compared to twenty.  As if banning weapons because they look like a military weapon instead of function like one accomplishes anything.  As if criminals or the insane give a damn.

No, what I want to focus on is the politician that thinks passing these feel good measures will solve any problems.  I want to focus on whether or not they even care.  None of what the federal or various state governments are planning will do anything to stop gun violence.  It is an insult to the people’s intelligence to say otherwise.  I don’t care what side of the issue you’re on, you should be outraged.

Obviously, if you’re a gun owner and you subscribe to the idea that as a free person you have the right to bear arms, you don’t like any infringement on your rights that the Constitution says, “…shall not be infringed.”  But what if you’re a gun banner?  What if you’re a public safety, nanny-state zealot?  Should you applauding these measures?  The answer is a resounding no!

Why?  Because a well practiced shooter can change a magazine in under five seconds while his victims cower on the floor.  Because a rifle without a pistol grip or a folding stock can be just as dangerous as one with those features.  Because those people that choose to use firearms to harm others don’t care what the law says.  Politicians have failed to address the real problem, which is not the guns or the law-abiding citizens that own them.

And honestly, they can’t.  You can offer all the mental health programs you want.  You can toughen up gun crime sentences.  Some people  are going to break laws and go nuts.  Some people are going to slip through the cracks.  But taking away my freedoms, your freedoms, to make us all safer, a) doesn’t’ work and b) means were aren’t really free.  Benjamin Franklin, a man I admire and respect greatly, said, “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”  Wise words.

No matter what side of this debate you’re on, you should be offended by the posturing of politicians.  They try to sell their feel good measures instead of actually doing anything to solve the problem.  You will just as likely to be shot but some nut (and by the way, more people were murdered with guns in Chicago last year, a city with the strictest gun laws in the nation, that were killed by all the lunatics in mass shooting in the U.S. in the past three decades and probably longer) after these meaningless bans as before.  We will never stop criminals and the mentally ill from using weapons to harm others if they are bent on doing it and anyone who says otherwise is ignorant, delusional or trying to get re-elected.

Or they know exactly what they’re doing and when these measures don’t work, they’ll insist that we just confiscate all firearms.

6 Responses

  1. Hi five to you… I keep hoping more people begin to open their eyes and minds the same way.

    • Thanks! I don’t usually talk about politics, but this isn’t politics. This is about our liberty and way of life. I’m not ready to be a subject just yet. I enjoy the freedom I currently enjoy to live my life like I want and losing our right to own guns is the surest way to lose that freedom.

  2. I agree with you, no matter what anyone tries to do to mitigate ANY kind of violence, it is still going to happen. I do not pretend to have any answers, but as you wrote the people that are going to commit these crimes don’t care what the laws are. Most of these people that made the news were already identified by psychologists and prescribed head meds its been shown, but how big a circle of “freedom denial” do we draw around them once that prescription is written? I don’t think it would it matter. If they can’t get a “scary” AR-15, they can get rocks, hammers, or anything else if they are intent on causing harm. As a species we’ve been killing ourselves for millions of years, those with the intent well always find a way.

    • Exactly. Convicted of a crime is one thing, but do you lose your rights if you are on meds? If you’ve been committed? There’s a little thing called Due Process down below the part about bearing arms in the Constitution. Freedom isn’t perfect and sometimes you have to take the bad with the good but it beats the heck out of just about any other human condition.

  3. It’s called pandering for votes and solves nothing… frustrating!

    • Exactly. Using tragedy to make voters feel good because they did “something.” Outside of politics, telling people they are going to get something when in fact they are not is called fraud.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 199 other followers

%d bloggers like this: